COMPARE THE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF A UK ADULT CITIZEN AND A Essay

COMPARE THE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF A UK ADULT CITIZEN AND A REFUGEE OR initiation SEEKER BOTH LIVING IN THE UNITED KINGDOM IN TERMS OF HEALTH AND favorable SECURITY - Essay ExampleThis essay compares the businesss and responsibilities of Asylum seekers and adult U.K citizens in terms of health and hearty security.The United Kingdom adult citizens exercise their rights and responsibility of contributing to the issues of health and social securities by choose and raising public opinions to the judicature. In contrast, the contribution of asylum seekers in these issues is minimal due to language barriers. The government tries to involve them by providing them with channels to communicate and give their decisions regarding the issues affecting them (NRIF, 2006 CRC, 2004). For instance, the English for Speaker of other Languages weapons platform aimed at teaching English to this group of people (ISE, 2005 Ragu, 2008). This effort aims at improving their communication abilit ies so that they can be able to take up their rights and responsibilities. in all adult citizens of U.K. arrive at an absolute right to the National Hospital Services (NHS), which includes relax medical treatment and care. On the other hand, not solely Refugees and Asylum seekers receive this facility (Aspinall & Watters, 2010, p.23). Those asylum seekers who have not received permanent residence check mark from the government cannot access this facility. They have access to the medical services but at their own apostrophize (Palmer & Ward, 2007). Those who have received confirmation enjoy national health services (NHS) without any payment (Crawley & Crimes, 2009).All adult citizens in U.K. have the right to register with a general practitioner of their choice free of charge. If a general practitioner cannot register them, he or she should give a substantial mind in writing to explain the cause (CIC, 2007). Contrary, refugees and asylum seekers may apply with general practitio ners (Lee, 2006 Refugee Council, 2005). However, the general practitioners have the right to consider such applications and decide whether to accept them or